Menu

According traits belong. People tend to assign individuals

0 Comment

According to Nier (2007),
stereotyping is automatic, making it inevitable.  However, some believe that stereotyping isn’t
automatic and it solely depends on the individual.  Stereotype is a generalization of a clique of
people, to which certain traits belong. 
People tend to assign individuals and objects into categories in ways to
organize their environment. This in turn classifies them into a certain
stereotypical placement. However, stereotypes can have many issues regarding its
inevitability, including cultural influences associated or portrayed, the
schemas of stereotyping one’s mental structure and through the use of grouping
individuals based on how society perceives them. Stereotyping is a topic of
importance to organizations, because it’s a natural informer as to why and how
people put others in stereotypical groups.     

           Is
stereotyping really inevitable? Stereotyping according to Nier (2007) is an
automatic processing of the sub-conscious retrieval of associations that are
developed through memory repetition. Therefore making people rely on their
automatic thinking rather than the controlled thinking. The nature of the
automatic thinking is that individuals aren’t able to escape or ignore the
process. Individuals tend to build and reinforce these stereotypes by automatic
process and there is no conscious control of memory retrievals.  Did you know that human bodies take an
immense effort to function, but when they’re automatically processed however, minimal
effort is required? This is why it is believed that the automatic processing of
why stereotyping is inevitable, as automaticity is naturally easier. Automatic
processing is flexible, and can form new behaviors. Because of this,
stereotyping can easily be retrieved, but controlled thinking uses conscious
efforts and limits the preconceived notions of stereotypes.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

           Stereotypes
were brought into individuals lives by cultural influences. According to Devine
(1989), stereotypes are established within childhood memories before one has
the ability to use cognitive processing to either accept or reject the
stereotypes. The Cultural influence present in one’s life makes it impossible
to prevent stereotypes from occurring within their daily lives. Cultural
influences affect’s not just the formation but also the acceptance of the
stereotype. According to the tripartite model of attitudes, a stereotype is a
cognitive component of prejudiced attitudes. Many theorists will suggest that
prejudice is an inevitable consequence of the stereotyping process (Devine, 1989). This process allows for learning
attitudes and stereotypes of social groups to become inevitable. It is also
strong evidence that stereotypes are gained in children’s memories before the
ability to use cognitive processing of the stereotypes taught. Within this
developmental process, stereotyping is an easier route of access for children to
gain personal beliefs making the culture. Through which an individual lives,
directly responsible for the application of stereotypes within their daily
life. 

           Schemas are
mental structures used to organize a person’s knowledge about their social
world and what is surrounding them (Aronson, Wilson, &
Akert, 2010). 
Opinions and judgments happen so quickly and effortlessly that once a
person views someone, they make instinctive judgments and decide who the person
is. Stereotypes are organized as multiple context specific schemas, activating
only by the combination of category and context information (Casper, Rothermund, &
Wenture, 2010). 
Most stereotypes lead to incorrect predictions about a particular person
or group allowing context along with schemas plays a role in developing a
stereotype. If stereotyping is so mechanized, then why do children of different
races interact with one another and think nothing of it? How do children who
live around different races grow up looking at all individuals equally? Nier,
(2007) insist that this is because individuals can teach themselves to avoid
prejudices just as they embrace the behavior in the first place. 

           A benefit of
stereotyping in fact, can lead to grouping; fitting in is the main concern for
most people and during this process stereotyping plays a role in this effort.
People, especially youth who use grouping can find where they belong and feel
comfortable in a group more quickly using beliefs associated with stereotypes.
Stereotyping may even form strong bonds between individuals while stereotypical
differences are present. Stereotyping exist everywhere we turn, and will take
time to resolve, making stereotyping not so inevitable. Fiske, (1989) states that
“inevitable is a mistaken assumption, at worst, and an inadequately examined
one at best”. Stereotyping is easily overlooked, and easily mistaken to be
nonexistent. Fiske researches stereotyping and how the brain reacts when there
are different prejudice inducing variables presented. Discovering that within
the brain, activity showing the functional magnetic resonance imaging, and
measuring cognitive activation of the use of stereotyping of lexical priming.
With neither responses of racial out-group being inevitable, but both responses
depended on that of the perceiver’s current social-cognitive goal (Fiske, 1989).

           Stereotypes
happen through what is called automatic processing and controlled cognitive
processing, their cultural influences and schemas with a benefit of grouping.
Automatic processing is easier in a sense that uses less efforts than that of
controlled thinking causing sub-conscious stereotypes to appear in social
situations. In cultural influences, people tend to establish attitudes and
beliefs that occur in their early childhood years, before having the ability to
accept or even reject them. Schemas use the context of stereotyping in
determining which environmental elements trigger stereotypes while grouping
establishes where one belongs through stereotyping.  Keeping stereotyping out of the world isn’t
all too impossible. Stereotyping can eventually be controlled, but stereotypes being
an automatic process, they are also the aspect of an individual’s differences and/or
efforts.

           As for a
call to action, a President of a company needs to take steps in order to
conclude that stereotyping is inevitable, even in their company. In order for
the President to take steps to solve issues involving stereotyping, would be to
provide diversity training to employees, the supervisors as well as managers, expanding
learning objectives that include diversity beyond that of the typical race,
sex, and national origin and religion topics. Their needs to be encouragement
of having open discussions by exploring employee diversity in terms of
generational differences, work styles, work philosophy and work ethics. A
simple effective way to combat stereotypes is to raise awareness of how these
stereotypes affect decision-making. Allowing people to be more aware of these
processes may help them along with helping the President of the company. Which
reduces the negative effects of the stereotypes on the decisions. Education is
a great step to teach others of the issues by presenting them with social
science research demonstrating the how’s, the whys, and when the stereotypes
are the most likely to influence evaluation decisions.

x

Hi!
I'm Alex!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out